Podcast

National Commercial Bank v. Wimborne

National Commercial Bank v. Wimborne

Citation – (1979) 11 NSWLR 156

Jurisdiction – Supreme Court of Queensland

Topic – Jurisdictional issue in Private International Law

Facts –

  • NCB was a corporation established under Saudi Arabian law. 
  • NCB had no branch office, agency or place of business in NSW. 
  • NCB had arrangement with NSW bank which involved bank collecting proceeds from NSW importers and remitting proceeds to NCB in Saudi Arabia. 
  • NCB was requested by the plaintiff to honour its guarantee to the full amount that was owed by the principal.

   Issue – Whether NCB was present/carrying on business in NSW and therefore subject to common law jurisdiction of NSWSC for  abuse of legal process in Switzerland

Judgement 

  • In common law, a company is considered to be present in a place and within the common law jurisdiction of its courts if it carries on business there. 
  •  Here, Holland J identified three criteria that tend to establish that a company is carrying on a business in the forum: 
  •  The company is represented in the forum by an agent who has authority to make binding contracts with persons in the place; 
  •  The business is conducted at some fixed and definite place in the forum; or 
  •  The business has been conducted in the forum for a sufficiently substantial period.
  • For submission, Holland J stated that in order to establish such a waiver, “the facts must show a voluntary act unequivocally evincing an intention to abandon or not assert a right”. — a question of fact.
  • If the defendant consistently maintains its objection to jurisdiction, it will not be taken as having submitted even it makes other applications which go beyond a protest to the jurisdiction.
  • Further, here, letters by the solicitor re intention to proceed in court was not held to constitute submission to court’s jurisdiction – this is because in determining whether conduct constitutes submission to a court’s jurisdiction, regard only to what happens in court proceedings.
  • Agency — a corporation will not have presence if the agent is ‘a mere ministerial agent’ or is carrying on his own business and not that of the foreign corporation. 
  •  Accordingly, here presence is not established by showing that the foreign corporation has appointed a local solicitor to commence or defend particular legal proceedings in the jurisdiction — i.e., not the business of the corporation.
  • Indicia as to presence by agent: – a) Name of the foreign corporation displayed at the agent’s place of business b) Foreign business pay rent/office expenses or employ staff for the agent.